On Monday 06 July 2009 21:37:14 Pavel Sanda wrote: > what you are talking about is 2. and was never planned for 2.0 > in particular. the problem is that we dont have any active > developer who understands this area, so while we can agree > that having working Docbook 4.4 XML output would be nice > for 2.0 there is nobody to do it or even cooperate with us > (we have already asked people using lyx+xml without any > response).
2. is working as it has been working in the previous versions but I agree that there are lots of details to work on before lyx can be used on docbook at the same level as it used with latex. > pavel -- José Abílio
