Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> So to come back to the previous thread, if Enrico's patch is not applied,
> which one of the "}\n" strings in output_latex.cpp should be modified ?
See attachment.
The new bool is introduced because pending_newline is used multiple times.
Jürgen
Index: src/output_latex.cpp
===================================================================
--- src/output_latex.cpp (Revision 38989)
+++ src/output_latex.cpp (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -720,6 +720,7 @@
}
bool pending_newline = false;
+ bool unskip_newline = false;
switch (style.latextype) {
case LATEX_ITEM_ENVIRONMENT:
case LATEX_LIST_ENVIRONMENT:
@@ -793,6 +794,7 @@
"$$lang",
current_lang));
pending_newline = true;
+ unskip_newline = true;
}
} else if (!par_lang.empty()) {
os << from_ascii(subst(
@@ -800,14 +802,19 @@
"$$lang",
par_lang));
pending_newline = true;
+ unskip_newline = true;
}
}
}
if (closing_rtl_ltr_environment)
os << "}";
- if (pending_newline)
+ if (pending_newline) {
+ if (unskip_newline)
+ // prevent unwanted whitespace
+ os << '%';
os << '\n';
+ }
// if this is a CJK-paragraph and the next isn't, close CJK
// also if the next paragraph is a multilingual environment (because of nesting)
