Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2012 um 13:30:39, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> > Op 21-6-2012 13:18, Uwe Stöhr schreef: > > Am 15.06.2012 11:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > >> Sorry, there was a response, but it just didn't convince me. > > > > And that's why you reverted it. I still don't understand your concerns > > but OK, I'm tired of fighting. I updated it with the help of Peter, so > > 2 developers worked on getting the description up to date. I don't see > > why your opinion is stronger then the one of 2 others. If I remember > > correctly you mostly don't like Peter's add-on to CMake. But his > > version is exactly CMake plus two files extra. > > > > Uwe > > I think I clearly explained by now why I don't like the change. I guess > my opinion is stronger, because I'm just sticking to the way it always > was, and not forcing my fellow developers to change to something that is > worse without any discussion and/or reasoning. > > Concerning the 2 developers: 1 left us, the other one has no clue about > CMake. > > Vincent
Hmm, I too prefer changes inside the cmake-own files rather than extra scripts valid only for few users. We _can_ of course provide also example scripts. Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.