a long, long time ago...
We were having this self-same discussion. I wrote a new InsetNote. It did
nothing but replace InsetInfo with GUI-I and NEW_INSET code. Shall I resubmit
it again now that NEW_INSETs are go? It'll provide the starting point for
some real work on this. I seem to remember that at the time we defined THREE
possible notes. It's all in the archives...
Also note that Jean-Marc and Dekel have both proposed a general gotoInset
dialog analogous to the Find&Replace dialog for text.
Angus
On Thursday 18 January 2001 15:47, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 18 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > The note inset should be renamed InsetBookmark, a menu item with the
> | > list of bookmarks added and a way to id the bookmarks. So that they
> | > can be easily moved/jumped to.
> | >
> | > That is my option.
> | >
> | > We should have two kindos of bookmars, the default non-peristent ones,
> | > and the persistent one.s
> |
> | The persistent ones are already called "labels" and there are already ways
> | to navigate between references (goto and return).
>
> No. The persisten ones are today called "Notes" and there are no way
> to navigate quickly beween them or to them.
>
> Lgb
