On 2015-11-03, Georg Baum wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> >> wrote:
> Regarding the test framework there is also boost::test (which would fit our > needs as well). Unfortunately I have neither experience with gtest nor with > QTest, so I don't know how it compares to these frameworks. Anyway, I think > the most important thing is to have a working setup, so I don't care much > which framework is used in the end. If there is no known advantage of gtest, I suggest using one of boost::test or QTest, as these come from sources we already rely on. However, I would also count as advantage, if there is someone familiar with the framework and willing to do the setup and lend a helping hand to others. (Maybe, the toolkit with the most developers willing to work on should win.) Günter
