> If there is no known advantage of gtest, I suggest using one of > boost::test or QTest, as these come from sources we already rely on. >
The major advantage of "gtest" is that I only have to type "git push" and we have the framework up and running. A downside of boost::test is, according someone on the internet, that it heavily relies on templates. This makes it slightly more difficult to debug, and maybe slightly more advanced usage. All living souls on the planet already rely on Google anyhow... ;) > However, I would also count as advantage, if there is someone familiar with > the framework and willing to do the setup and lend a helping hand to others. > (Maybe, the toolkit with the most developers willing to work on should win.) > We have discussed this topic several times, and no one ever stood up with a strong preference for, or claimed to have a lot of experience with one of the frameworks. Vincent
