Am 08.01.2016 um 09:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[email protected]>: > > Le 08/01/2016 09:17, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> A possible solution I’ve attached as patch. >> Any better solution or ok to commit? > > Yes, unless somone has a different brilliant idea.
Am I right that it makes explicit what is otherwise implicit? So it is safe to commit? > The problem is that libc++ provides std::next even when not in C++11 mode. Is the implementation of std::next compatible to the e.g. ParagraphList::iterator or not? > > This problem will go away in 2.3. How? With your fix? Does it fix wrong LyX code or is it some work around? Stephan > > JMarc > > PS: I have a fix for your compilation problem in C++11 mode (libc++ bug) >
