Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 15:02:14, schrieb Kornel Benko <[email protected]> > Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 14:27:46, schrieb Stephan Witt <[email protected]> > > Am 08.01.2016 um 10:26 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[email protected]>: > > > > > > Le 08/01/2016 10:08, Stephan Witt a écrit : > > >> Am 08.01.2016 um 09:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[email protected]>: > > >>> Yes, unless somone has a different brilliant idea. > > >> > > >> Am I right that it makes explicit what is otherwise implicit? So it is > > >> safe to commit? > > > > > > Yes, I think so. The question is only maintainability. Guillaume > > > complained that the is fragile because new code can forget to add this > > > explicit lyx::. > > > > Scott, > > > > I’d like to commit the patch (attached again). Is this ok? > > It applies cleanly, compiles on linux. First tests are OK. > > > Stephan >
Meant +1
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
