On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 08:11:19PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 12:21:44, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > <skost...@lyx.org> > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 07:09:44AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > > * FreeSans seems to provide the correct script-support info not to trigger > > > the false-positive error http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8035 > > > > > > However, setting all of "mainfont", "sansfont", and "monofont" to > > > FreeSans > > > seems "hackish" to me. > > No it is not hackish IMHO. The test should show, that with a suitable font > this file is compilable. > It is a remnant from the times we had defined fonts for texF only. > If the non-tex font is defined in the document, it will be used. I agree with Kornel that it is not hackish of the tests. I think what Günter's main underlying point (please correct me if I'm wrong) is to make it clear that *LyX* (not the tests) should have a better framework for encouraging system fonts by default for XeTeX and LuaTeX. But since LyX does not do that, my opinion is that it is a great idea for the tests to do the best job they can at testing the use of system fonts. Note that we do not always use FreeSans---it depends on the language. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
