Re: A major bug with tabular (lyx-1.1.6fix1)

[John Levon]

On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:

> > Yes, the 1.2.0cvspatched is just that. One gains 2M (to compare with
> > memory consumption of around 50M!). This means that undo is really not
> > much, compared to lyxtext.
> 
> Ok this means we have to find a way to only use 1 LyXText instance, but
> how ... ???

I'm sure this is a naive question, but wouldn't a copy-on-write implementation
help here ?

john