On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 09:14:00PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:39:32PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > >> > >> If we do revert, then we have to make the 504->505 file format conversion > >> an empty one, and if we later re-introduce an updated layout file, we > >> have to use a new file format number. This is important, because some > >> people use beta versions for serious work (and we are glad about every > >> user who is willing to accept this risk). > > > > Uwe kindly did the work to revert. Since in lyx_2_2.py there is > > > > [505, []], > > > > in convert, does that satisfy your concern above? I am quite ignorant of > > lyx2lyx. Are we good to go for beta regarding this issue? > > Yes. I hope you did not wait for me to comment (I did not manage to read the > list earlier).
Good, thanks for confirming. There were also a couple of other issues that were cleaned up meanwhile. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature