Am Dienstag, 23. Februar 2016 um 20:06:05, schrieb Guenter Milde
<mi...@users.sf.net>
> On 2016-02-20, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 2016-02-20, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016 um 16:34:50, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >> <mi...@users.sf.net>
>
> Dear Kornel,
>
> I hope to have solved the "XeTeX + Awesome" mystery:
>
> >>> >> >> Strange: It works here, both "per hand" and via ctest...
>
> >>> >> > I installed fonts-font-awesome, now the font is found.
>
> >>> I can't see where font Awesome is loaded - the font selectiong GUI
> >>> shows all is set to "default". This seems to be some internal font
> >>> setting of the modernCV package (or its style options). Nothing to
> >>> blame the document edits.
>
> OK, now I see it is loaded in the tex output -- however, this is due to the
> line
>
> #
> \DeclareLaTeXClass[moderncv,ebgaramond.sty,fancyhdr.sty,fontawesome.sty,ifpdf.sty,marvosym.sty]{Modern
> CV}
>
> in moderncv.layout.
>
> The edit of the example "unearthed" a dependency problem with moderncv.layout
> that can occure when
>
> * compiling with XeTeX,
> * fonts awesome installed for LaTeX but not declared a system font.
>
> See answer 2 in
> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/132888/fontawesome-font-not-foundI have different problem with xelatex. The 'broken' example in this link compiles fine here, so xelatex finds the font already. > >>> >> > But there are still missing glyphs. > ... > >>> > Output of xelatex (system font + tex font): > >>> > Missing character: There is no in font FontAwesome/OT! > > > Do you mean the literal character between "no" and "in font"? > > > My editor says this is: > > > Character '' (61868, 0xF1AC) > > > which is in: > > > @@ E000 Private Use Area F8FF > > @+ This range of 6400 code points is dedicated to private use. > > It is actually a non-standard character in the private use area: > > Font Awesome is a free (CC-BY-3.0) icon font from GitHub, that contains > several different icons for various purposes. It is designed for web > usage, and thus all the characters are defined in the private unicode > range to avoid confusing screen readers. > > -- https://coderwall.com/p/r67dyq/using-font-awesome-with-xe-latex > > I am not sure whether this is a good idea, but here you are... I don't understand. I already have the newest fontawesome.sty in TL, so no need to add it to some project dir. > > However, it is not the same as the one(s) missing in LuaTeX: > > Indeed, the LuaTeX problem is different, it does not depend on moderncv or > the awesome font. > > Günter Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
