On 04/18/2016 05:19 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > > Op 16 apr. 2016 21:50 schreef "Richard Heck" <rgh...@lyx.org > <mailto:rgh...@lyx.org>>: > > > > > > As Scott pointed out, my previous suggestions for how fixes committed to > > the staging branches should be handled in trac was silly. We can't reuse > > "fixedinmaster" for 2.3-staging. I'm also not sure that we want to > > introduce a new status "fixedinstaging" for such a short time. > > > > First of all, 2.3-staging should be master, and current master should > be 2.2.x. (see another thread) >
Yes, I know this is your view, and some people share it, but it's not what we decided to do. Perhaps we should decide to do it next time. I may well, for myself, decide to do something similar with 2.2.x, but I need to think about it. > Besides that, what is wrong with a keyword fixedinmaster and a > milestone 2.3 for things in 2.3-staging ? It looks perfectly fine to > me: the bug will be fixed in 2.3, but is not fixed for 2.2.x. > Something like this would work, I'm sure, but more keywords seem to sow more confusion. Richard
