On 04/19/2016 04:49 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:07:01PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >>> We should already be on 2.2 and not on master, which is the future: 2.3 >>> >> Yes, that was also my proposal. >> >> However, people appear to be afraid to not have the 2.2.0 tag in master. > Yes, I was the scared one. Without a lot of knowledge regarding git, I > was hesitant to change what I thought was done in the past. Also we had just > released and tagged rc1. I do not feel comfortable releasing 2.2.0 or rc2 in > a different way from rc1. > > My guess is that Vincent's proposal is the best one and I hope we move > towards that in the future.
Probably, but I agree that changing this sort of procedure so close to release isn't a great idea. rh
