On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:21:02AM +0000, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
> 
> 
>       From: Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>
> 
> >Yes, this is all great information. Thank you for investigating. It
> >would be useful to figure out why 2.1.4 works for you and 2.2.0rc1 does>not.
> >Can you run the command "ldd" on the compiled 2.1.4 binary and the>2.2.0rc1 
> >binary? Any differences?
> Yes, there are differences, but they are meaningless to me. The result of 
> diff is:
> 
> 
> bruce@debian:~/Documents/testing$ diff -y ldd-lyx.txt ldd-lyx-2.2.01.txt 
> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fffe8259000)                  |    
> bruce@debian:/usr/local/bin$ ldd lyx-2.2.0rc1 
>     libenchant.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libencha |        
> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffd36197000)
>     libhunspell-1.3.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lib |        
> libenchant.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libencha
>     libaspell.so.15 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaspel |        
> libhunspell-1.3.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lib
>     libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007 |        
> libaspell.so.15 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaspel
>     libmagic.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmagic.s |        libz.so.1 
> => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007
>     libQtGui.so.4 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtGui.s |        
> libmagic.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmagic.s
>     libQtCore.so.4 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore |        
> libQtSvg.so.4 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtSvg.s
>     libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++ |        
> libQtGui.so.4 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtGui.s
>     libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007 |        
> libQtCore.so.4 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore
>     libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1  |        
> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++
>     libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007 |        libm.so.6 
> => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007
>     libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libg |        
> libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 
>     libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0 |        libc.so.6 
> => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007
>     libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.s |        
> libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libg
>     libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x000 |        
> libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0
>     libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfo |        
> libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.s
>     libaudio.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudio.s |        libdl.so.2 
> => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x000
>     libpng12.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.so.0  |        
> libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfo
>     libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfree |        
> libaudio.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudio.s
>     libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libg |        
> libpng12.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.so.0 
>     libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSM.so.6 (0 |        
> libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfree
>     libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libICE.so.6  |        
> libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libg
>     libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXrend |        libSM.so.6 
> => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSM.so.6 (0
>     libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXext.so. |        
> libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libICE.so.6 
>     libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6  |        
> libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXrend
>     librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x000 |        
> libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXext.so.
>     /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00005587da4e1000)      |        
> libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6 
>     libpcre.so.3 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3 (0 |        librt.so.1 
> => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x000
>     libexpat.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexpat.so.1  |        
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00005562ecb4a000)
>     libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXt.so.6 (0 |        
> libpcre.so.3 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3 (0
>     libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXau.so.6  |        
> libexpat.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexpat.so.1 
>     libffi.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.6  |        libXt.so.6 
> => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXt.so.6 (0
>     libuuid.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuuid.so.1 (0 |        
> libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXau.so.6 
>     libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so.1  |        
> libffi.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.6 
>     libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXdmcp.s |        
> libuuid.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuuid.so.1 (0
>                                   >        libxcb.so.1 => 
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so.1 
>                                   >        libXdmcp.so.6 => 
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXdmcp.s

The main thing I wanted to see was that the same Qt libraries are being
used. And that does appear to be the case.

> >Also, do you see the same problem with cross-references? We have a>separate 
> >bug that has to do with cross-references. I would be surprised>if it's 
> >related, but who knows?
> I have not yet tried cross references, but will do so tonight.

OK it will be interesting to know.

> >Are you familiar with the concept of a git bisect?
> No, I have never used git, and know nothing about it or the necessary 
> concepts.

A git bisect is a way of saying "this old version used to work, this new
version doesn't work, what is the change ('commit') that caused it to go
from working to not working". This way we can get an idea of exactly
what caused the problem. It will take time to proceed, because to narrow
down which change caused the problem, you need to compile several times.
If I give you instructions, are you up for doing this? If so, can you
first check that 2.1.0 compiles fine for you and that you do not see the
citation problem with it?

> >Finally, something is strange with quoting for your emails. When 
> >you>replied, it did not put my email indented with ">". it is thus hard 
> >to>see above what I wrote and what you wrote. If you don't mind 
> >changing>whatever option (look for "quoting" options), that would be 
> >appreciated.
> Yes indeed! Something to do with how yahoo does things. Trying to find out 
> how to change this, but will do it manually as necessary.

Thanks for doing that. Sorry for the bother, but it really does help
keep things organized.

Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to