On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:05:58PM -0400, Joel Kulesza wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Even in the case where imagemagick could produce low quality results, if > > imagemagick is used for the conversion for the PDF wouldn't it make > > sense to also use it for LyX's display? This would give the user a > > better chance of realizing that the final output is poor quality. > > > > > I'm not sure if you're recommending default behavior, but if you are: are > there cross-OS portability concerns with this approach?
What I'm recommending is that we use the same conversion to show the image in LyX as is used to show the PDF. There would likely be less variation across platforms in the LyX display if we used Qt's converter, but I'm more concerned about variation between the LyX display and the PDF display. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
