Le 06/06/2016 22:43, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Guillaume Munch wrote:
Any reason to want to get rid of boost completely?

Well, that's a long term wish. It is not nice to pack boost lib together with
our sources and someone need to care updating boost within the source tree.

Note that we have things that are not used in our tree, like for example boost/typeof, which is selected because of a shortcoming of bcopy.

JMarc

Reply via email to