Le 07/06/2016 07:46, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 06/06/2016 22:43, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Guillaume Munch wrote:
Any reason to want to get rid of boost completely?

Well, that's a long term wish. It is not nice to pack boost lib
together with
our sources and someone need to care updating boost within the source
tree.

Note that we have things that are not used in our tree, like for example
boost/typeof, which is selected because of a shortcoming of bcopy.


Am I altering extract.sh correctly?


Reply via email to