On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:06:52PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:23:32PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> 
> > In that case, if you already have everything set up and that does not cost
> > you any more effort, thank you for stepping forward.
> 
> I will run them over the night and give the results tomorrow.

Tests indicate that commit b170b6e4 lead to ctex_pdf4_texF going from
failing to passing, and no other changes in the tests. So according to
the tests [1], b170b6e4 is safe.

Scott

[1] it should be said that about 500 (out of 5000) of the tests are
failing, so they do not provide nay information.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to