Am Freitag, 16. September 2016 um 19:28:04, schrieb Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> > On 2016-09-13, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2016-09-13, Kornel Benko wrote: > > >>> >> * Do you still need the "suspendeTests"? What for? > > >>> > Yes, we need them. This tests will not be executed with the call 'ctest > >>> > -L export'. > > ... > > >>> In the meantime, we know the particular problem for most of the suspended > >>> tests. > >>> Some were fixed. Others require inversion (we know the problem is a > >>> wontfix or a bug on trac). > > Therefore, I'll reword the question: > > Do you call `ctest -L export` regularely?
This is my alias for export:
ctest -j12 -timeout 300 -L export -E "xhtml|lyx16|lyx21|lyx22"
> Could you imagine calling `ctest -L export -LE "texissues|attic"` instead?
Sure, but if you think texissues should not be tested, make them part of
suspended.
> -1 more to type
>
> +1 filters not only 58 but 80 "wontfix" inverted tests
>
> +4 makes the test system less complicated.
>
> Do you call `ctest -L inverted` regularely?
Sometimes, yes.
> Could you imagine calling `ctest -L inverted -LE "texissues|attic"` instead?
>
> ...
>
> >> My understanding is that they are suspended because of difficult to
> >> solve, therefore we do not try to tests them every time.
>
> However, the "usual full run" (without -L) does test them.
Sure, I never claimed otherwise.
> How often is -L used without also -R to select specific tests via regexp?
Here? Almost always. That was one reason to invent/use labels.
> Günter
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
