On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 05:49:30PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 18/03/2017 à 17:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:01:23AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > I have a patch and it seems to work well. I want to clean it up before > > > posting. I will post it again for review because even though it seems to > > > work well, I wonder if there is a cleaner way of doing it. I will post > > > a cleaned up version in a couple of days. > > > > Attached are two patches. Are they what you had in mind? > > Or maybe something much simpler like (not sure about the exact syntax, look > up other examples) > > Lexer lex(is) > while (lex.next(true)) > args.push_back(lex.getString());
OK I will take a look at this. > It is not necessary to rewrite what is already done by Lexer IMO. +1 > > Because I edit splitArg(), this could cause problems with other LFUNs. > > You mean LFUNS that expect that \ is not interpreted? I would think that > those would use the full argument directly, or use getLongArg(). OK good to know. Thanks, Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
