On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 12:15:57PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 30. August 2019, 22:03:26 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Should the following:
> >
> > \newfontfamily\amharicfont{NotoSansEthiopic}
> >
> > be instead:
> >
> > \newfontfamily\amharicfont{Noto Sans Ethiopic}
> >
> > If I make this change, then the document almost compiles for me. I still
> > have a "Missing character" error as follows:
> >
> > There is no . in font Noto Serif Lao
> > Regular/OT:script=lao;l
> >
> > I'm confused how this test passes for both Günter and Kornel, but not me.
> > I am using the noto fonts from the Ubuntu packages. Perhaps you two are
> > using newer versions of them from upstream? Could that explain the
> > differences we see?
>
> Definitely not newer version here.
>
> > Scott
> >
>
> I am confused too.
> OTOH, I see the message
> LaTeX.cpp (742): Log line: Package fontspec Info: Could not resolve
> font "NotoSansEthiopic/I" (it
> LaTeX.cpp (742): Log line: (fontspec) probably doesn't
> exist).
> Don't understand, why xetex compiles without error.
>
> Changing now, as you suggested to 'Noto Sans Ethiopic':
> The compilation still passes, but this time in 8.04 secs. (Without the change
> the compilation took 67.41 secs! )
> LaTeX.cpp (742): Log line: Package fontspec Info: Could not resolve
> font "Noto Serif Lao/I" (it probably
> LaTeX.cpp (742): Log line: (fontspec) doesn't exist).
>
> $ dpkg -s fonts-noto-hinted | grep Lao
> * Noto Sans Lao
> * Noto Sans Lao UI
> * Noto Serif Lao
> So, this font _is_ installed. Still, xetex does not find it.
> Checking for other fonts in the log, I see that many fonts are not resolved.
> $ egrep 'Could not resolve font'
> Testing/Temporary/LastTest.log|sort|uniq|wc
> 21 306 2138Interesting. I tried installing fonts-noto-hinted but then I realized that package is marked as obsolete. So I uninstalled that and instead installed fonts-noto-core and fonts-noto-extra. I'm on Ubuntu 19.04. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
