On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:12:19PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
> On 30.08.19, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Should the following:
>
> > \newfontfamily\amharicfont{NotoSansEthiopic}
>
> > be instead:
>
> > \newfontfamily\amharicfont{Noto Sans Ethiopic}
>
> > If I make this change, then the document almost compiles for me.
>
> Here, it compiles with both variants, so I changed it to the spaced one.Thanks, this fixes those errors for me. > > I still have a "Missing character" error as follows: > > > There is no . in font Noto Serif Lao > > Regular/OT:script=lao;l > > > I'm confused how this test passes for both Günter and Kornel, but not me. > > I am using the noto fonts from the Ubuntu packages. Perhaps you two are > > using newer versions of them from upstream? Could that explain the > > differences we see? > > Maybe. Here, I have NotoSerifLao.otf version 1.03 from the package > fonts-noto-hinted (Debian/stable) Version: 20161116-1 > and there is no missing character. Here I cannot find NotoSerifLao.otf in any package. I only find ttf files: $ apt-file find NotoSerifLao fonts-noto-core: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/noto/NotoSerifLao-Bold.ttf fonts-noto-core: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/noto/NotoSerifLao-Regular.ttf fonts-noto-extra: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/noto/NotoSerifLao-Black.ttf fonts-noto-extra: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/noto/NotoSerifLao-Condensed.ttf <cut> $ If I download the Noto fonts from the homepage, the archive also only contains ttf. Could that make a difference? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
