* Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-04-09 19:14] schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> please read the statement concerning gcc 2.96 at gcc.gnu.org and you will see
> they are definitely not be willing to have a look at the problem. However, if
> the bug also occurs with gcc-3.0-cvs, they should know about it, of course.
but  redhat's bugzilla should know about it, if it's a 2.96

another opinion about ggc-2.96:

http://www.bero.org/gcc296.html

i dont want to start a discussion about it, since my C(++) knowledge is nearly nul, 
but other opinions also seem
reasonable

ronny

Reply via email to