On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, 11:45 Pavel Sanda, <sa...@lyx.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 03:16:05PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > If no one fixes it in time, shall we postpone 2.4.0 > > No, I wouldn't do that. > > > or proceed with 2.4.0 and state that Qt6 is not officially supported > because of #12215? > > I see three options: > 1) we don't support QT6 and break during ./configure if detected > 2) we allow Qt6 with --enable-stdlib-debug > 3) we allow Qt6 but forcing single thread only. > > I don't have clear winner between these three. >
I think that not supporting Qt 6 is the worst option, especially as it may create problems with package managers if they want to switch to Qt 6 for any reason. Requiring a parameter to be set at configure time to allow Qt 6 acknowledging the potential problems would be acceptable, in my opinion. >
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
