On 2/2/26 7:07 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 09:28:14AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 02/02/2026 à 09:26, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I feel like users would best understand "wrappable". We have wrappable
text, wrappable figures, and now wrappable insets.
That's the problem: we use it for something else.
Ah, I see. Indeed tricky.
I thought I had sent the proposal: flowable, but I don't see the
message. That's a text-ish term, 'flowing text', and its usual meaning
isn't too distant from what this would be.
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
