On 09-Jul-2001 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I really like the new ERT (sorry: 666) Inset, but as I mentioned in an 

The "666" was one decicion on the developers meeting (just as the removal
of the LaTeX-font-attribute)!

> earlier message, its major disadavantage are the small LaTeX-commands 
> inside words (special symbols, kerning, space-commands etc.).
> Please have a look at the small (and stupid) example-file (attached) 
> with current CVS.
> Is there really no chance to display those "micro-ert's" less confusing?

IMO it should me no problem to have 2 type of "666" insets an inlined one
(which does NOT break on rowend!!!) and a displayed one! We could also have
an option dialog to set this if it is wanted. It's REALLY easy to realize
as all this stuff is already thought of in the InsetText #:O)

         Jürgen

--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna        E-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N       Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen           Web:     http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._

Mirrors should reflect a little before throwing back images.
        -- Jean Cocteau

Reply via email to