On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 03:46:07PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > | > | Since we are continuously adding new features to LyX, reLyX stays behind,
> > | > | so a lyx->latex->lyx cycle can loose information.
> 
> as I said: from a users sight lyx->latex is only important 
> to find critical errors or to convert some stuff to whatelse 
> ever.
> why should I do a lyx->latex->lyx cycle?

You need it if you work on a document with a coauthor which doesn't have LyX.

Reply via email to