On 16-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:12:34AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> If people agree (I didn't still get agreement from at least Lars and
>> Jean-Marc!) we should change the call to bv->unlockInset() to
>> bv->unlockInset(HOW), then the above should work if you call
>> bv->unlockInset(CURSOR_AFTER) (or any good name for telling that
>> unlockInset should move the cursor after the inset!
>
> Can't you simply re-use 'FINISHED_RIGHT' etc for that purpose?
Well no, I really would like to remove them from the return-state enum as
they should not be used anymore as return state. So I would like to create
another enum UNLOCK_STATE (or any better name).
Jug
P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc: me all mail
separately.
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
QOTD:
"It's hard to tell whether he has an ace up his sleeve or if
the ace is missing from his deck altogether."
