On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:03:58AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:54:30AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Did I say that we need a stable release again, like yesterday? So if you > > want to open up Pandor^W development again, do it *only* for things > > that are directly relevant to Undo and other things that are known to > > cause us grief, and *only* for clean-up and structural fixes. In other > > words, extend the definition of the word 'fix'. > > The structural changes _are_ directly relevant to undo, since they are the > only way to get it Right. Everything else is some kind of crutch. > > We opted for the crutch so far. A full year long. But nobody was able to > provide one. > > Ok. Maybe we could just disable the tricky parts in undo and put out a > 'stable' 1.1.7 which is essentially current CVS. With all that red "you > don't really want to use that unless you need one of the new features"
How 'stable' would that actually be? Martin
msg33035/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
