It's easier to discuss this on lyx-devel so I go for that way.
> As before, in a new document create a footnote and within it an ERT inset.
> Don't enter any text.
>
> Cursor right before footnote:
> <Down> does nothing, should enter footnote
Why you are at the left of the footnote and press DOWN why should the
cursor go right???
> Cursor at beginning of footnote (right before ERT):
> <Down> goes outside footnote, should enter ERT
Again you are left of the ERT inset in the last row of the footnote if
pressing DOWN you shouldn't go right you should navigate down!
> Cursor at beginning of ERT:
> <Down> goes outside footnote, should do nothing
Why again! You are in the last row of the ERT and in the last of the footnote
Down should leave the ERT and the Footnote!
> <Up> goes outside footnote, should go to beginning of foonote
Same as above you are in the first row of ERT and first of footnote!
> Cursor at end of footnote (right after ERT):
> <Down> goes outside footnote, should go into ERT
Ditto!
> By the way, "<Down> and <Up> behave logically, not visually" wouldn't be a good
> answer, because
> a. It's inconsistent with the behavior when there *is* some text around the
> insets -- try it.
Please explain I think it IS consitent!
> b. It's inconsistent with mathed cursor navigation (go Andre!).
I don't care how navigation is inside mathed I think that navigation on the
main LyXText has always been visually and not logically. I understand that
this may be different in formulas and that Andre did the right thing there!
> c. It's incompatible with the principle of least astonishment.
I think moving the cursor visually is the on with least astonishment!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
The main problem I have with cats is, they're not dogs.
-- Kevin Cowherd
