On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 04:46:09PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > As before, in a new document create a footnote and within it an ERT inset.
> > Don't enter any text.
> >
> > Cursor right before footnote:
> > <Down> does nothing, should enter footnote
>
> Why you are at the left of the footnote and press DOWN why should the
> cursor go right???
Agreed.
> > Cursor at beginning of footnote (right before ERT):
> > <Down> goes outside footnote, should enter ERT
>
> Again you are left of the ERT inset in the last row of the footnote if
> pressing DOWN you shouldn't go right you should navigate down!
But we don't navigate down, now do we ? There is no down. We should
stay where we are if there's no row below.
> > Cursor at beginning of ERT:
> > <Down> goes outside footnote, should do nothing
>
> Why again! You are in the last row of the ERT and in the last of the footnote
> Down should leave the ERT and the Footnote!
Hmm.
> > <Up> goes outside footnote, should go to beginning of foonote
>
> Same as above you are in the first row of ERT and first of footnote!
Hmm.
> > Cursor at end of footnote (right after ERT):
> > <Down> goes outside footnote, should go into ERT
>
> Ditto!
I don't think it should go into ERT either.
> > By the way, "<Down> and <Up> behave logically, not visually" wouldn't be a good
> > answer, because
> > a. It's inconsistent with the behavior when there *is* some text around the
> > insets -- try it.
It seems Eran is actually asking for logical not visual behaviour in
several of these anyway !
The thing is, put some text (on the same line) above and below, and
*everything* makes perfect sense.
So even though things are a little bit odd, I definitely vote for
WONTFIX
regards
john
--
"When the patent office gets into the game, "new" means "we don't have
it in our files", and "unobvious" means unobvious to someone with an IQ
of 50."
- Richard Stallman
