On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:47:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > Already this is likely to clash with GUII :( > How seriously I don't know. > > > - better .tex -> .lyx coversion > > Luckily independent (you mean python-relyx yes ?)
I don't mean anything special regarding languages etc. I just want to be able to parse TeX properly, but given my set of skills it's probably going to be C++ (unless, of course, somebody shows me a _good_ tex parser in any other language apart from web ;-}) > > - the "cursor stuff" > > MASSIVE change ... Indeed. Probably the one with the biggest impact. > > - unify "real" insets and mathed's insets > > I suppose this is big too. We have been moving in this direction. Getting the cursor right is probably the biggest challenge in this area. > > - David's preview stuff > > Potentially high risk ... Nah... at least for mathed this should be _really_ straightforward. Less than 500 lines, almost no impact on existing code. > > mathed only > > - fill in gaps in AMS support > > - further work on math-extern > > - reduce memory consumption > > these are all OK :) To get \mbox working I need "text insets" and I only can reuse the "real" text insets if the cursor is unified... *cough* > For example, a while back you wanted to change lyxfont.h for some > reason, Purely for speeding up recompilation. If it is not used at all anymore - fine. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
