On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:15:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Patch attached.
>
> A behaviour that would seem reasonable to me when handling those WORD
> lfuns is that they would be like there non-word counterpart except
> that they would do as if the inset were locked. That is, if there is a
> faction right of cursor, lfun_right would go in the fraction (if it is
> not locked) and lfun_wordright would jump over it unconditionnally?
> I think this is a good implementation of the word notion and would
> maybe even make the locking feature useless.
>
> What do you think? I took a look, but the code is a bit too
> complicated for me to change safely.
I could implemnent this. It would basically be something like
bool MathCursor::wordleft(bool sel)
{
autocorrect_ = false;
targetx_ = -1; // "no target"
if (inMacroMode()) {
macroModeClose();
return true;
}
selHandle(sel);
return posLeft() || idxLeft() || popLeft() || selection_;
}
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
