On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:32:42AM -0700, Roland Krause wrote:
> I remember from a year ago, that your Qt port wasnt really using Qt's
> signal and slot but instead your own implementation, is that still
> true?
Qt frontend uses signal/slots from Qt. It communicates with the lyx core
via boost's signal/slots mechanism, which is far nicer.
> I take it that what you need is not really the .ui files from designer
> but instead you need also the implementation for the dialogs, otherwise
> that seems kind of worthless to me. Designer dialogs are very easily
> made by non programmers, you could ask your userbase for that. That is
> after all the beauty of designer.
.ui would be a nice start. Are you offering ? :)
> done an outstanding job cleaning up things. Maybe you can update on the
> website what exectly you need, I know a few KDE and Qt developers from
> some work on KDevelop and maybe there is something that can be done. I
> did miss the call for help on qt-interest, if it was there.
Yes, we need some more publicity.
> Also how about allowing people access to a part of your CVS repository.
> In KDE you do get an account because you want one, the benefit of the
> doubt is given to anybody. No one bothers really sending patches unless
> it is feature freeze. You may want to consider that instead of sending
> patches and fixing them endlessly.
I don't think we want that... and I do not see the benefit of it
regards
john
--
"Everything in the world runs through Birmingham, and
gets stuck on New Street."
- Brian Marsden
