On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 10:51:59AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote: > Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Andre Poenitz wrote: > | > I have no strong opinion or even an idea on how to solve that, I just > | > want to say that there _is_ a problem. A serious one to be precise. > | > | Would it be really such a bad idea to branch off 1.4.0 immediately at the > | moment 1.3.0 goes into feature freeze? > > No. > > | Patches, sent to the list, that are not qualified for 1.3.0, are now temporarily > | ignored, put on a imaginary waiting list, or what ever; but if 1.4.0 was there, >they > | could go in there. > > How would this help 1.3.0? > > -- > Lgb It wouldn't. It would help 1.4.0.
As I see it the question this boils down to is: is this a zero-sum thing? Does saying 'stay in your room and do your homework before you're allowed to watch television' really work that way here? Martin
msg45840/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
