On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:25:17PM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> > Well, I personally would like .tex integration in the core, but writing
> > new code in C++ does not imply that it be inside the kernel. One can have
> > a separate executable even named reLyX if one think it is cute.
>
> One could. But in fact half or so of the math parser is the part that stuffs
> LyX internal stuctures, so this part has to be "in" anyway. Building a
> separate binary out of the second 700 lines does not make too much sense
> imo - at least not in the beginning.

Sorry, I don't understand well what you have said. AFAIK, reLyX should not
touch math, so any latex math expression is already good .lyx code (am I
right?) and therefore would not have to be translated.

On the other hand, implementing latex parsing right inside the lyx kernel
would save the .lyx format "rendering", so no translation is needed, just
parsing. Right? This would really mean reLyX dead.

Sorry for bothering you with my questions. Feel free to ignore me.

Cheers,
Joćo.

Reply via email to