Angus Leeming wrote: > Just a thought. Should we have different names for the qt and xforms > executable? People won't be able to install rpms for both otherwise.
Well why would one use both? Traditionalists will use lyx-xforms. All other users will probably use lyx-qt. Noone will use both. It also should be easy enough fot those people who administer multi user machines to just copy a lyx binary of both types somewhere in to the path. -- Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
