Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming wrote:
|
| > Just a thought. Should we have different names for the qt and xforms
| > executable? People won't be able to install rpms for both otherwise.
|
| Well why would one use both? Traditionalists will use lyx-xforms. All other
| users will probably use lyx-qt. Noone will use both.
|
| It also should be easy enough fot those people who administer multi user
| machines to just copy a lyx binary of both types somewhere in to the path.
The best would probably be do create four rpms. (or three)
ipzone-xforms
ipzone-qt
ipzone-common
ipzone-doc
xforms and qt would basically only contain the binaries.
--
Lgb
