Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | We currently spend more time with doing nothing waiting for releases
| > than | with actual work. This was already bad with 1.2, but its now close
| > to | five months that we are waiting for 1.3. | | I still believe this
| > time had better be invested in fixing real problems | like undo crashes
| > or even features in areas that can be stabilized within a | week or so.
| >
| > I know of now such feature...
|
| Like mathed <=> Maple/Mupad/Mathematica interoperation?
|
| Is completely independent of the rest of the world, and can be stabilized
| in five minutes by just switching back to "last known good".
Is that stabilizing? I thought that counted as reverting and ditching.
| > | At least it would have been honest to say 'it takes half a | year' than
| > to talk about two months.
| >
| > I do not belive that was promised.
|
| No, but "Christmas" was talked about.
That was really when we could expect qt frontend to be finished.
Having the release five weeks after the real code freeze does not
sound to bad to me.
--
Lgb
