Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>>>>> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> I tend to think it is the best solution. Note that it could be >>> "edit-properties tabular", where edit-properties searches the >>> nearest inset with name "tabular" around. This means there will not >>> be much lfun duplication. > > John> Ah ok. So getStatus() has access to the argument ? > > Yes, it has access to a FunRequest. It does heavy use of it in some > cases. > > If only getStatus was not implemented as a big ugly switch, it would > be great stuff...
Just a thought... Could we not have a heirarchy of FuncRequest-derived classes as a one to one replacement for each LFUN? -- Angus
