On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:26:20PM +0000, A.P.Manners wrote: > Unless someone knows otherwise (knows how to instruct boost to get > around the missing header files in std) I would conclude that boost is > preventing lyx from being built with gcc 2.95.2.
2.95.3 works fairly well under Linux, though. Maybe they did indeed change the library significantly between 2.95.2 and 2.95.3 Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
