On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 04:48:35PM +0000, John Levon wrote: > > fancy_computation(); > > where is this code ?
I was asking whether such code exists. > Given that opening an inset causes 4 actual redraws + exposes, I think > looking at that would be a more obvious way to go ! Probably. But replacing it with a single one probably won't work together with the current cleverness. So the question is "should we remove the cleverness first, face a slow down but retain LyX in a usable state and keep working from there by removing multiple redraws" or "should we remove multiple redraws first and fix problems afterwards". As current cvs is unusable for any real work anyway it does not matter much. _I_ would have taken the first approach, but if you work on it, it is obviously your choice. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
