John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 05:14:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> No. Not unless the rest of you is ok with that. what I am saying is
>> that we should not cater for 2.96. (If you still want to support 2.95
>> I'll go along with that.)
>
| Are you saying that the problem occurs with 2.96 but not 2.95 or 3.x ?
| That would seem quite odd.
No, I am not saying that either.
>> More up to you than me...
>
| I don't think we should land anybody in it ... look what most FreeBSD
| installs are still using for example
One of the resons why I am not pushing gcc 3.x harder.
--
Lgb
