John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 05:14:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > >> No. Not unless the rest of you is ok with that. what I am saying is >> that we should not cater for 2.96. (If you still want to support 2.95 >> I'll go along with that.) > | Are you saying that the problem occurs with 2.96 but not 2.95 or 3.x ? | That would seem quite odd.
No, I am not saying that either. >> More up to you than me... > | I don't think we should land anybody in it ... look what most FreeBSD | installs are still using for example One of the resons why I am not pushing gcc 3.x harder. -- Lgb