On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 08:54:38AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > So now the interesting question: What do I miss? > > Nothing comes to my mind rigth now, but as you know problems come when you > have started implementing... ;-)
I think the crucial translation is top_y -> new_top_y (buffer absolute to screen absolute) which should be > > PS: There'll still be O(n) parts for updateCounters() and similar. > > However, those have been there before and were tolerable in 1.3.x. > > I agree that it's doable. I do think that it's more complex than what we > have now. Before getting into details, what exactly are we avoiding, > updateParPositions? Are you sure that this is the bottleneck? We are avoiding several things. First is updateParPositions(), second (and more important) is the need to have a (semi-)correct row cache at all. So we would basically never have to call redoParagraph() manually. And we would not need redoParagraph() in e.g. LyXText::init... Andre'
