On Thursday 10 February 2005 16:35, Andreas Vox wrote: > > > enough, XHTML apparently also knows "valign=-7px" > > > > What do others use? > > What others?
db2latex > > > g) What "density" or magnification should be used for maths? > > > (Not knowing the final font size) > > > > Me neither. > > > > > c) Produce illegal valign attributes which can be used directly for > > > XHTML > > > > I will close my eyes here. There is an ;-) missing here. :-) > I did some research. It's in the semantics for "CSS3.lines". CSS2 and > CSS1 support valign without length or percentage values (which is not > better than the default) The problem as usual, it that there aren't many browsers who support the complete specification of css3, and probably some of them have bugs (hint: exploder). Been there, done that. > So, now I think we could declare %local.common.attr to include "style" > for all elements and use the CSS3 syntax&semantics. > For PNG: style="valign: -7px" > For EPS: style="valign: -5%" I think that it is not good style to mix relative with absolute measures, but then this is just an aesthetic point, so please ignore it. ;-) > I don't think there are any solutions yet which align inline math bitmaps > properly for DocBook. If you know any, please let me know. Don't know either. > > > g) No idea. That's the advantage of EPS images, they are scalable... > > > > I agree also. > > Let's ask Chris... OK. > > > > PS: Have you seen that it is possible for docbook 5.0 to be > > > > release without a dtd? More and more xml is becoming the default. > > I had a look now. LyX support for db5 will need a major rewrite, I think > :-) Less than what you could expect. :-) > BTW, I have to more questions: > > 1. Are there any CSS stylesheets for Docbook XML? I could only find ones > for XHTML. I have seen some quest recently for CSS stylesheets, I don't remember where and the final result though. > 2. I think you were the last to work on docbook.layout & co. Couldn't we > add environments for admonitions etc quite easily? Also I think I > spotted one or two typos/mistakes related to the inclusion of counters. Certainly, the basics are there. :-) Also with char style support for 1.4 a lot more are possible now. > Ciao > /Andreas -- José Abílio
