On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:21:13PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:34:43PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > > >> Michael Gerz a écrit : > >>> Gentlemen, > >>> > >>> I think I have to give some comments on the heated 1.4 vs. 1.5 discussion. > >> I've hoped that it would be more heated... like it should be for a > >> decent friday flame war but I did not succeed. Except for Enrico and > >> Georg who managed to write one or two bad words it was not very rude ;-) > > > > Please, point out what bad word I used. > > It was maybe only one from Georg then, you should have done better!
Remember that if one doesn't want to, two do not quarrel. I esteem Georg (and everyone else here) for his work on LyX and don't want dispute with him. > >>> Regarding cygwin: Right now there are 4 cygwin-related patches that are > >>> not part of 1.4.X. Abdel, Enrico, I am pretty sure that Jean-Marc will > >>> consider them if you provide good reasons. At least two of them look > >>> rather trivial. > >> Or if it is too much work to backport, I would suggest Enrico to stay on > >> the bleeding edge. Unless there's a pressing need from users that is. > >> But it seems to me that cygwin users are pretty happy with Enrico > >> LyX-cygwin-1.4.1 package, aren't they Enrico? > > > > All 2 or 3 of them, apparently ;-) > > Very good. At least you have some :-), I still have none :-( It seems that you want to forge ahead ;-) -- Enrico
