TeXmacs is a good alternative.

Hiding away preamble stuff has always been sufficiently problematic for me
for me not to take to LyX.

I have not much used TeXmacs but it has a lot of this and more.

For my documents, I stick to LaTeX with a live preview. Just can't beat
that kind of power.

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Liviu Andronic <landronim...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> wrote:
> > On 2015-06-10, Benedict Holland wrote:
> >
> >> Since there are already excellent Latex editors, I don't
> >> understand why it would be desirable for Lyx to incorporate such
> features.
> >
> > I love LyX, because I can input math from the keyboard, without click and
> > search in menus and dragging around - just using familiar LaTeX syntax.
> >
> > The same would apply for many smaller edits (font changes, package
> > insertions, ...): if the source view were edible, I could do many of
> > these changes fast and per keyboard without searching in menus or the
> > shortkey-list.
> >
> Maybe some sort of math-like tab-activated completion could be
> implemented, for commands that LyX supports natively... There'd be
> less scope for getting it wrong in such a set-up.
>
> So something along the lines of:
> - activate math-like completion as in "\"
> - propose a list of completion possibilities given an exclusive list
> of commands that LyX understands and supports natively
> - run tex2lyx on the input when user signals they're done
> - if something didn't go to plan, spit out ERT
>
> But I expect this wouldn't be a trivial implementation to get
> everything right and cover all potential complications...
>
> Liviu
>
>
> > (Of course, this is from the view point of someone familiar with LaTeX -
> but
> > this is a large part of the LyX user base.)
> >
> > Günter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Do you think you know what math is?
> http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/ian-stewart-2013-08-02
> Or what it means to be intelligent?
> http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/john-duncan-2013-08-30
> Think again:
> http://www.ideasroadshow.com/library
>

Reply via email to