Sven Schreiber wrote: > My guess is that relyx has problems with the latex file and produces a > bad lyx-file which lyx2lyx cannot handle. Too bad that the relyx
The guess is probably correct. > 1. I read somewhere that another import tool is coming with the new lyx > version (tex2lyx?); if this is true (and it would be great), would it be > possible to provide it standalone even before the new lyx version is > released? It would be possible, but some work. Unfortunately the table import is the least developed area of tex2lyx, so it would probably not help much in this case. > 2. In the meantime it would be nice if the relyx-savvy could provide > (permanent links to) more concrete advice on what latex constructs to > avoid. (In my particular case retyping the tables in lyx is probably > quicker than hand-editing the latex code, but for long-term or > search-and-replace batch operations this may be helpful.) Maybe I just > missed it? IMHO the needed time would be better spent in improving tex2lyx wrt tables. > 3. Because the lyx doc format apparently changes from time to time, it > seems to me that lyx2lyx is a very very important component of lyx. I > understand that developer resources are limited, so what I'm saying is > just that making lyx2lyx more robust should maybe receive higher > priority than other or new features. The problem is most definitely not lyx2lyx, but reLyX. It does not produce clean 2.15 files, but a mixture of different formats. This in turn causes trouble for lyx2lyx. Georg
