http://wiki.lyx.org/Layouts/Revtex4-1 says: > Mention features from the REVTeX 4.1 documentation > that should be tested (and fixed in the layout if > broken) before final release of this layout. > > * New environment: video > * \listofvideos seems broken (latex doesn't compile)
Nicely done. See my other message about your compilation error. > * Using \cite instead of \footnote for footnotes as > the REVTeX guide suggests. So far \footnote works but > may not be acceptable by journals. Will using the LyX > citation inset generate proper latex? I don't see any mention of this in the revtex user's guide. I don't see a problem with this. Revtex produces a .bib file from your footnotes and use the bibtex mechanism. For submission you need to inline the bibitems anyway. > * New feature: structured abstracts using the description environment This works (at the level of LyX) out-of-the-box. One can insert "description" or other list environments and increase their nesting depth (using TAB or the toolbar buttons). > * Test newly added support for arXiv.org in BibTeX This should just work. More interesting are these features, which would require changes in the LyX citation dialog (or use of ERT): - Multiple references in a single bibliography entry. - Prepending and/or appending text to a citation. - Online citation \onlinecite (this is not new in revtex 4.1, but maybe now is an opportunity to implement it in LyX) > * Port the LaTeX AIP sample to LyX and visually diff the generated PDFs > * Port the LaTeX APS sample to LyX and visually diff the generated PDFs This would indeed be a nice accomplishment. -- Julien
